Radeon Pro SSG
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro SSG
2016Why buy it
- ✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌642.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 35W.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 260W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro SSG
The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro SSG scores 10,972 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro SSG is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2025 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,972 | 11,162+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+4% | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 2025 MHz+93% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+300% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro SSG does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro SSG leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro SSG and 64-bit on the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro SSG draws 260W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 152.5% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 35W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.2 | 318.9+656% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6999 | — |
| Codename | Fiji | AD107 |
| Release | July 26 2016 | February 26 2024 |
| Ranking | #249 | #254 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro SSG and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
