Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A1000

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Radeon Pro SSG

2016Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A1000

2024Core: 727 MHzBoost: 1462 MHz
Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A1000 Performance Spectrum

Radeon Pro SSG
8 GB 260
10,972
+1.5%
brand logoRadeon R9 380X
brand logoRadeon RX 470 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX 480
brand logoRadeon 8040S
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7650 GRE
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
brand logoRadeon RX 9070
RTX A1000
8 GB 50
10,814
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 770
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX Titan
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low121 FPS
medium103 FPS
high85 FPS
ultra59 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low107 FPS
medium90 FPS
high76 FPS
ultra50 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low235 FPS
medium204 FPS
high154 FPS
ultra121 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low120 FPS
medium97 FPS
high76 FPS
ultra57 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low494 FPS
medium395 FPS
high329 FPS
ultra247 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low487 FPS
medium389 FPS
high324 FPS
ultra243 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low243 FPS
medium211 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra143 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low243 FPS
medium209 FPS
high170 FPS
ultra142 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low186 FPS
medium161 FPS
high131 FPS
ultra110 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low146 FPS
medium128 FPS
high110 FPS
ultra89 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low178 FPS
medium142 FPS
high117 FPS
ultra99 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low80 FPS
medium61 FPS
high52 FPS
ultra36 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low138 FPS
medium116 FPS
high97 FPS
ultra81 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low110 FPS
medium94 FPS
high75 FPS
ultra65 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low133 FPS
medium120 FPS
high88 FPS
ultra74 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low87 FPS
medium71 FPS
high56 FPS
ultra45 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Radeon Pro SSG
low122 FPS
medium101 FPS
high85 FPS
ultra70 FPS
1080P
RTX A1000
low104 FPS
medium82 FPS
high67 FPS
ultra59 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    834.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,999 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
  • ❌420% higher power demand at 260W vs 50W.
  • ❌63.8% longer card at 267mm vs 163mm.

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $6,250 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 821% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 260W, a 210W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 163mm instead of 267mm, a 104mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro SSG is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (10,972 vs 10,814), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX A1000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,250 cheaper on MSRP at $749 vs $6,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 821% (14.4 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro SSG still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro SSG

The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

NVIDIA

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro SSG scores 10,972 and the RTX A1000 reaches 10,814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro SSG is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1462 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A1000
G3D Mark Score
10,972+1%
10,814
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
4096+78%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.602 TFLOPS+28%
6.737 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1462 MHz+39%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
256+256%
72
L1 Cache
1 MB
2.3 MB+130%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A1000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro SSG leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A1000
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro SSG and 128-bit on the RTX A1000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000) — the Radeon Pro SSG has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A1000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A1000
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A1000
Encoder
VCE 4.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
UVD 7.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro SSG draws 260W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 135.5% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 163mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A1000
TDP
260W
50W-81%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
163mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
42.2
216.3+413%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro SSG came in at $6999, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, RTX A1000 was 89.3% cheaper ($6250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the RTX A1000 offers 800% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A1000
MSRP
$6999
$749-89%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
14.4+800%
Codename
Fiji
GA107
Release
July 26 2016
April 16 2024
Ranking
#249
#251
Search Radeon Pro SSG on AmazonSearch RTX A1000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.