
Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅31.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅31.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than RTX A1000 Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A1000 Embedded GPU make more sense than Radeon PRO W6600M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600M and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

Radeon PRO W6600M
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 1140 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 16 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 64.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,407+4% | 11,009 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.29 TFLOPS+56% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2034 MHz+78% | 1140 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+75% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 88% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600M | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 35W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 82mm |
| Height | 0mm | 4mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.7 | 314.5+148% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












