Radeon PRO W6600M vs RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

AMD

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021Core: 1224 MHzBoost: 2034 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

2022Core: 630 MHzBoost: 1140 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

  • 31.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than RTX A1000 Embedded GPU?
Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 31.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.6% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W6600M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 31.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.6% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W6600M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, RTX A1000 Embedded GPU still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does RTX A1000 Embedded GPU make more sense than Radeon PRO W6600M?
Yes. RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 90W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W6600M. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W6600M currently gives you 3.6% higher G3D Mark and 31.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low140 FPS105 FPS
medium118 FPS88 FPS
high103 FPS74 FPS
ultra71 FPS49 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS91 FPS
medium92 FPS75 FPS
high75 FPS55 FPS
ultra52 FPS36 FPS
4K
low50 FPS36 FPS
medium43 FPS33 FPS
high32 FPS20 FPS
ultra28 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low243 FPS120 FPS
medium206 FPS97 FPS
high168 FPS76 FPS
ultra134 FPS57 FPS
1440p
low170 FPS88 FPS
medium142 FPS68 FPS
high112 FPS55 FPS
ultra88 FPS42 FPS
4K
low93 FPS53 FPS
medium78 FPS42 FPS
high65 FPS34 FPS
ultra49 FPS24 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low513 FPS495 FPS
medium411 FPS396 FPS
high342 FPS330 FPS
ultra257 FPS248 FPS
1440p
low385 FPS372 FPS
medium308 FPS297 FPS
high257 FPS248 FPS
ultra192 FPS186 FPS
4K
low257 FPS248 FPS
medium205 FPS198 FPS
high171 FPS165 FPS
ultra128 FPS120 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low262 FPS221 FPS
medium231 FPS188 FPS
high186 FPS151 FPS
ultra157 FPS127 FPS
1440p
low199 FPS172 FPS
medium176 FPS149 FPS
high138 FPS115 FPS
ultra113 FPS95 FPS
4K
low117 FPS96 FPS
medium99 FPS75 FPS
high79 FPS60 FPS
ultra60 FPS48 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600M and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

AMD

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6600M scores 11,407 and the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2034 MHz vs 1140 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 16 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 64.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score
11,407+4%
11,009
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ampere
Process Node
7 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
1792
2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.29 TFLOPS+56%
4.669 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2034 MHz+78%
1140 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
112+75%
64
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
28+75%
16

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
5+25%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Encoder
VCN 3.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VCN 3.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6600M draws 90W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 88% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6600MRTX A1000 Embedded GPU
TDP
90W
35W-61%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
82mm
Height
0mm
4mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
126.7
314.5+148%