CPU
GPU
RTX A1000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB.
| Insight | RTX A1000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $179 versus $500 for the RTX A1000, it costs 64% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 177.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A1000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+177.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($179) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A1000 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
RTX A1000
The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A1000 scores 10,814 and the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB reaches 10,749 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A1000 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (RTX A1000) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1462 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (RTX A1000) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 72 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,814 | 10,749 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.737 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1462 MHz | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72 | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A1000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A1000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The RTX A1000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A1000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | RTX A1000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A1000 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 33.3% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A1000) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 163mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-29% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 163mm | 160mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 216.3+41% | 153.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 launched at $749 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 and now averages $179. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 64.2% less ($321 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.6 (RTX A1000) vs 60.1 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 178.2% better value.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749 | $169-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $179-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.6 | 60.1+178% |
| Codename | GA107 | GA107 |
| Release | April 16 2024 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #251 | #252 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A1000 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
