RTX A1000 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

130%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

125%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

125%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

122%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

121%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

117%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

115%

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

106%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

104%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

102%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

100%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

99%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

97%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

94%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

92%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

88%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

87%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

86%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

86%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

83%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

82%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

75%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

72%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX A1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 37.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	RTX A1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+37.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-37.4%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $500 for the RTX A1000, it costs 85% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 385.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RTX A1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+385.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTX A1000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX A1000 and GeForce GTX 1650

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RTX A1000 scores 10,814 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX A1000 leads by 37.4%. The RTX A1000 is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (RTX A1000) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1462 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RTX A1000	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	10,814+37%	7,869
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304+157%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.737 TFLOPS+126%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1462 MHz	1665 MHz+14%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72+29%	56
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+161%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX A1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX A1000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The RTX A1000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A1000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX A1000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX A1000	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A1000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	RTX A1000	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	RTX A1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A1000 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 40% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A1000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 163mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	RTX A1000	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	163mm	229mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	216.3+106%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The RTX A1000 launched at $749 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 85% less ($425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.6 (RTX A1000) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 385.6% better value. The RTX A1000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).