RTX A1000 vs Tesla M40 24GB

NVIDIA

RTX A1000

2024Core: 727 MHzBoost: 1462 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M40 24GB

2015Core: 948 MHzBoost: 1112 MHz
Similar parts
·

RTX A1000 vs Tesla M40 24GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RTX A1000 vs Tesla M40 24GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,251 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 171.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
  • Measures 163mm instead of 267mm, a 104mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Tesla M40 24GB

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 167% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
  • 63.8% longer card at 267mm vs 163mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX A1000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (10,814 vs 10,641), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX A1000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,251 cheaper on MSRP at $749 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 171.4% (14.4 vs 5.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RTX A1000 vs Tesla M40 24GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M40 24GB

The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.

Graphics Performance

The RTX A1000 scores 10,814 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A1000 is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (RTX A1000) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1462 MHz vs 1112 MHz.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
G3D Mark Score
10,814+2%
10,641
Architecture
Ampere
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304
3072+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.737 TFLOPS
6.832 TFLOPS+1%
Boost Clock
1462 MHz+31%
1112 MHz
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
72
192+167%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+109%
1.1 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A1000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M40 24GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RTX A1000 and 256-bit on the Tesla M40 24GB. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A1000) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A1000) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A1000 draws 50W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A1000) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 163mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
TDP
50W-80%
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
163mm
267mm
Height
69mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
216.3+408%
42.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RTX A1000 came in at $749, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. On MSRP, RTX A1000 was 62.5% cheaper ($1251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.4 (RTX A1000) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the RTX A1000 offers 171.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP
$749-63%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
14.4+172%
5.3
Codename
GA107
GM200
Release
April 16 2024
November 10 2015
Ranking
#251
#253

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.