
RTX A1000

Tesla M40 24GB
RTX A1000 vs Tesla M40 24GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX A1000 vs Tesla M40 24GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
RTX A1000 vs Tesla M40 24GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX A1000
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,251 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 171.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
- ✅Measures 163mm instead of 267mm, a 104mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌167% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
- ❌63.8% longer card at 267mm vs 163mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX A1000 vs Tesla M40 24GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX A1000
The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A1000 scores 10,814 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A1000 is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (RTX A1000) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1462 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,814+2% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.737 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1462 MHz+31% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 192+167% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+109% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M40 24GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RTX A1000 and 256-bit on the Tesla M40 24GB. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A1000) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A1000) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | RTX A1000 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A1000 draws 50W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A1000) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 163mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX A1000 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 163mm | 267mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 216.3+408% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RTX A1000 came in at $749, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. On MSRP, RTX A1000 was 62.5% cheaper ($1251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.4 (RTX A1000) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the RTX A1000 offers 171.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | RTX A1000 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-63% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4+172% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | GM200 |
| Release | April 16 2024 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #251 | #253 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














