
RTX A2000 12GB vs GeForce GTX 1060

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 12GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A2000 12GB uses modern memory architecture. The RTX A2000 12GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A2000 12GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 36.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+36.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-36.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $380 for the RTX A2000 12GB, it costs 84% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 364.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+364.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 12GB and GeForce GTX 1060

RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A2000 12GB scores 13,721 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the RTX A2000 12GB leads by 36.3%. The RTX A2000 12GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,721+36% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328+30% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1733 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 104 | 160+54% |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB+251% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A2000 12GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The RTX A2000 12GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the RTX A2000 12GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 12GB draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 88% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-61% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 173mm |
| Height | 68mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 196.0+251% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 84.2% less ($320 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 364.5% better value. The RTX A2000 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $249-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $60-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.1 | 167.7+365% |
| Codename | GA106 | GP104 |
| Release | November 23 2021 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #177 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















