RTX A2000 12GB vs Radeon RX 6600M
RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 12GB
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6600M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 12GB.
| Insight | RTX A2000 12GB | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 12GB and Radeon RX 6600M
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Radeon RX 6600M
The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 12GB scores 13,721 and the Radeon RX 6600M reaches 13,922 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 12GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600M) with 104 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,721 | 13,922+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328+86% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 8.659 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2416 MHz+101% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 104 | 112+8% |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB+560% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 26 | 28+8% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 12GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600M) — the RTX A2000 12GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL 12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M).
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 12GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6600M's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-30% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Height | 68mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 196.0+41% | 139.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 12GB and Radeon RX 6600M
