RTX A2000 12GB vs Arc B570
RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Arc B570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 12GB
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc B570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 12GB.
| Insight | RTX A2000 12GB | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (249mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc B570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $219 versus $380 for the RTX A2000 12GB, it costs 42% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 77.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A2000 12GB | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+77.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($219) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 12GB and Arc B570
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 12GB scores 13,721 and the Arc B570 reaches 14,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 12GB is built on Ampere while the Arc B570 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 2,304 (Arc B570). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2500 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 18 (Arc B570) with 104 Tensor cores vs 144.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,721 | 14,060+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328+44% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 11.52 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2500 MHz+108% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 104 | 144+38% |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB | 4.5 MB+36% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 18 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 26+44% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 104 | 144+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 18 MB (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 18 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB) vs Intel Xe Media (Arc B570). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Intel Xe Media. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570).
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | Intel Xe Media |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Intel Xe Media |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 12GB draws 70W versus the Arc B570's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 600W (Arc B570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 249mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-53% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 249mm |
| Height | 68mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 196.0+109% | 93.7 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Arc B570 launched at $219 and now averages $219. The Arc B570 costs 42.4% less ($161 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 64.2 (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 offers 77.8% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $219-51% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $219-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.1 | 64.2+78% |
| Codename | GA106 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | November 23 2021 | January 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #177 | #169 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 12GB and Arc B570
