
RTX A2000 12GB vs GeForce RTX 2060

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 12GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A2000 12GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $380 for the RTX A2000 12GB, it costs 68% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 225.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+225.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 12GB and GeForce RTX 2060

RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 12GB scores 13,721 and the GeForce RTX 2060 reaches 14,114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 12GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 104 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,721 | 14,114+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328+73% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS+24% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1680 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 104 | 120+15% |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB+74% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 26 | 30+15% |
| Tensor Cores | 104 | 240+131% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A2000 12GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The RTX A2000 12GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 12GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72.
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-56% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 229mm |
| Height | 68mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 196.0+122% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 68.4% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 225.8% better value. The RTX A2000 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX A2000 12GB | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $349-22% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $120-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.1 | 117.6+226% |
| Codename | GA106 | TU106 |
| Release | November 23 2021 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #177 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















