RTX A2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
RTX A2000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX A2000 Mobile is positioned at rank #214 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 Mobile.
| Insight | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6500 XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 Mobile and Radeon RX 6500 XT
RTX A2000 Mobile
The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.
Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 Mobile scores 9,506 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT reaches 9,603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 1687 MHz vs 2815 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,506 | 9,603+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.637 TFLOPS+50% | 5.765 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1687 MHz | 2815 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the RTX A2000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 Mobile draws 95W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 11.9% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-11% | 107W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.1+12% | 89.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 24 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #273 | #270 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 Mobile and Radeon RX 6500 XT
