RTX A2000 Mobile vs Intel Arc Pro A60
RTX A2000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX A2000 Mobile is positioned at rank 214 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 is on rank 60, so the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A2000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A60.
| Insight | RTX A2000 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A2000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 Mobile and Intel Arc Pro A60
RTX A2000 Mobile
The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 Mobile scores 9,506 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 reaches 9,493 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 1687 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro A60) with 80 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,506 | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.637 TFLOPS+3% | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1687 MHz | 2050 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+25% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 256+220% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 Mobile draws 95W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 31.1% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-27% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.1+37% | 73.0 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $380 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $380 |
| Codename | GA107 | DG2-256 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #273 | #275 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 Mobile and Intel Arc Pro A60
