
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Intel Arc Pro A60

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 133.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A60.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+133.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-133.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $380 for the Intel Arc Pro A60, it costs 47% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 343.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+343.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Intel Arc Pro A60

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 9,493 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 133.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro A60) with 184 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+134% | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+142% | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2050 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+188% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 256+39% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 51.4% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 130W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+38% | 73.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380 and now averages $380. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 47.4% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 343.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $380-24% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-47% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+344% | 25.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | DG2-256 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #275 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














