RTX A2000 Mobile vs Radeon R9 Fury
RTX A2000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX A2000 Mobile is positioned at rank #214 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A2000 Mobile is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The RTX A2000 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 Fury is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 Mobile.
| Insight | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 Fury remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A2000 Mobile and Radeon R9 Fury
RTX A2000 Mobile
The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A2000 Mobile scores 9,506 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A2000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 1687 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,506 | 9,521 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.637 TFLOPS+20% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1687 MHz+69% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 224+180% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+184% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 4096-bit+3100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A2000 Mobile draws 95W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 97.3% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-65% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 195mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.1+189% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | RTX A2000 Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $549 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | GA107 | Fiji |
| Release | April 12 2021 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #273 | #274 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A2000 Mobile and Radeon R9 Fury
