
RTX A400
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX A400 is positioned at rank #26 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A400 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The RTX A400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 68.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A400.
| Insight | RTX A400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-68.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+68.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $135 for the RTX A400, it costs 56% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 278.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+278.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($135) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A400 and GeForce GTX 1060

RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A400 scores 5,983 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 68.2%. The RTX A400 is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (RTX A400) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1762 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,983 | 10,064+68% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.706 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+228% |
| Boost Clock | 1762 MHz+2% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 160+567% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A400 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 113% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A400) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-72% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | — | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 119.7+114% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A400 launched at $135 MSRP and currently averages $135, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 55.6% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.3 (RTX A400) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 278.6% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $135-46% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $135 | $60-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.3 | 167.7+279% |
| Codename | GA107 | GP104 |
| Release | April 16 2024 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #397 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















