RTX A400 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
RTX A400
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX A400 is positioned at rank 26 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M is on rank 30, so the RTX A400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A30M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A30M.
| Insight | RTX A400 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A400 and Intel Arc Pro A30M
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A400 scores 5,983 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M reaches 5,862 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A400 is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (RTX A400) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 1762 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (RTX A400) vs 8 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) with 24 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A400 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,983+2% | 5,862 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.706 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+51% |
| Boost Clock | 1762 MHz | 2000 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A400 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | RTX A400 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A400 draws 50W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 0% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A400) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RTX A400 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 119.7+2% | 117.2 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX A400 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $135 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $135 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | DG2-128 |
| Release | April 16 2024 | August 8 2022 |
| Ranking | #397 | #402 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A400 and Intel Arc Pro A30M
