CPU
GPU
RTX A400
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX A400 is positioned at rank #26 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX A400?
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER dwarfs the RTX A400 in raw performance with a G3D Mark score of 31,831 versus 5,982, making it over 5x faster in consumer benchmarks. However, these GPUs serve entirely different markets: the 4070 Ti SUPER is a gaming flagship, while the RTX A400 is an entry-level professional workstation card optimized for CAD, rendering, and AI applications.
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features 16GB GDDR6X memory with 285W TDP, designed for high-refresh 1440p and capable 4K gaming. The RTX A400 has only 4GB GDDR6 with a compact single-slot design consuming just 50W, built for professional application stability and ISV certifications rather than raw gaming performance.
For gaming, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the obvious choice with its vastly superior performance. The RTX A400 serves professionals who need certified drivers, workstation stability, and a low-power form factor for CAD, video editing, or edge computing workloads. These products shouldn't be cross-shopped as they target completely different use cases.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 427.8% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A400.
| Insight | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-427.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+427.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $135), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 20.8% better value per dollar than the RTX A400.
| Insight | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($135) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A400 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A400 scores 5,983 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 427.8%. The RTX A400 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (RTX A400) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1762 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (RTX A400) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 24 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,983 | 31,578+428% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 7680+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.706 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+1382% |
| Boost Clock | 1762 MHz | 2610 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 24 | 240+900% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 60+900% |
| Tensor Cores | 24 | 240+900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A400 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 140.3% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A400) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-82% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 119.7+8% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A400 launched at $135 MSRP and currently averages $135, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The RTX A400 costs 77.1% less ($455 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.3 (RTX A400) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 20.8% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $135-83% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $135-77% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.3 | 53.5+21% |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | April 16 2024 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #397 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A400 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
