CPU
GPU
RTX A400
Popular choices:
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX A400 is positioned at rank 26 and the GeForce MX570 is on rank 117, so the RTX A400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570.
| Insight | RTX A400 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $135 for the RTX A400, it costs 11% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 7.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A400 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($135) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A400 and GeForce MX570
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A400 scores 5,983 and the GeForce MX570 reaches 5,738 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A400 is built on Ampere while the GeForce MX570 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 768 (RTX A400) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570). Raw compute: 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570). Boost clocks: 1762 MHz vs 1155 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (RTX A400) vs 16 (GeForce MX570) with 24 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,983+4% | 5,738 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.706 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+75% |
| Boost Clock | 1762 MHz+53% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 16+167% |
| Tensor Cores | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A400 draws 50W versus the GeForce MX570's 25W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A400) vs 350W (GeForce MX570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 25W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 119.7 | 229.5+92% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A400 launched at $135 MSRP and currently averages $135, while the GeForce MX570 launched at $150 and now averages $120. The GeForce MX570 costs 11.1% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.3 (RTX A400) vs 47.8 (GeForce MX570) — the GeForce MX570 offers 7.9% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX A400 | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $135-10% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $135 | $120-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.3 | 47.8+8% |
| Codename | GA107 | GA107 |
| Release | April 16 2024 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #397 | #407 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A400 and GeForce MX570
