RTX A4000 Mobile vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX A4000 Mobile
Popular choices:
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000 Mobile.
| Insight | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX A4000 Mobile
The RTX A4000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,782 points.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,073 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000 Mobile scores 14,782 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU reaches 15,073 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 160 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,782 | 15,073+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+82% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+43% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2130 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 80+67% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+82% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 5 MB+79% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+82% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 160+82% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000 Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 50W — a 78.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 50W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 167mm |
| Height | 0mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 128.5 | 301.5+135% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
