G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RTX A4000 Mobile vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RTX A4000 Mobile vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RTX A4000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅17.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 136).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

2025

Why buy it

✅2.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A4000 Mobile instead at 14,782 vs 14,363, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2021. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

RTX A4000 Mobile vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX A4000 Mobile

The RTX A4000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,782 points.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RTX A4000 Mobile scores 14,782 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 160 Tensor cores vs 136.

Feature	RTX A4000 Mobile	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
G3D Mark Score	14,782+3%	14,363
Architecture	Ampere	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	5120+18%	4352
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS	17.03 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1680 MHz	1957 MHz+16%
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	160+18%	136
L1 Cache	5 MB+16%	4.3 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	32 MB+700%
Ray Tracing Cores	40+18%	34
Tensor Cores	160+18%	136

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX A4000 Mobile	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX A4000 Mobile has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell carries 16 GB. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RTX A4000 Mobile and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX A4000 Mobile	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB	32 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	RTX A4000 Mobile	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).

Feature	RTX A4000 Mobile	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	9th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	6th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A4000 Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	RTX A4000 Mobile	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
TDP	115W	70W-39%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	167mm
Height	0mm	68mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	128.5	205.2+60%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2021).

Feature	RTX A4000 Mobile	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
MSRP	—	$849
Codename	GA104	GB206
Release	April 12 2021	August 11 2025
Ranking	#159	#165

Search RTX A4000 Mobile on Amazon

Search RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.