
RTX A4000 Mobile vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

RTX A4000 Mobile
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A4000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000 Mobile and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

RTX A4000 Mobile
The RTX A4000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,782 points.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000 Mobile scores 14,782 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 160 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,782+3% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+18% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1957 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+18% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 5 MB+16% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+18% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 160+18% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4000 Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000 Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 167mm |
| Height | 0mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 128.5 | 205.2+60% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A4000 Mobile | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $849 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $748 |
| Codename | GA104 | GB206 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #159 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















