
RTX A4000 vs GeForce RTX 2080

RTX A4000
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 102.4% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2080.
| Insight | RTX A4000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $1,111 for the RTX A4000, it costs 77% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 326.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+326.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,111) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000 and GeForce RTX 2080

RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.

GeForce RTX 2080
The GeForce RTX 2080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,676 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000 scores 19,463 and the GeForce RTX 2080 reaches 18,676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 2080 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000) vs 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1710 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 2080) with 192 Tensor cores vs 368.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,463+4% | 18,676 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+109% | 2944 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+90% | 10.07 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1710 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+4% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+107% | 2.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+4% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 368+92% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2080 has 8 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 102.4% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+102% | 7.906 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000) vs 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080).
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000 draws 140W versus the GeForce RTX 2080's 215W — a 42.3% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX A4000) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 2080). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-35% | 215W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 139.0+60% | 86.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000 launched at $1111 MSRP and currently averages $1111, while the GeForce RTX 2080 launched at $699 and now averages $250. The GeForce RTX 2080 costs 77.5% less ($861 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.5 (RTX A4000) vs 74.7 (GeForce RTX 2080) — the GeForce RTX 2080 offers 326.9% better value. The RTX A4000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX A4000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1111 | $699-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1111 | $250-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.5 | 74.7+327% |
| Codename | GA104 | TU104 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #85 | #94 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











