RTX A4000 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

132%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

131%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

126%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

123%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

107%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

103%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

103%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

101%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

100%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

97%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

95%

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

87%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

86%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

84%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

82%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

82%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

80%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

77%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

76%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX A4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 147.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (16 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	RTX A4000	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+147.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-147.3%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,111 for the RTX A4000, it costs 93% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 498.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RTX A4000	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+498.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,111)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTX A4000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000 and GeForce GTX 1650

RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RTX A4000 scores 19,463 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX A4000 leads by 147.3%. The RTX A4000 is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RTX A4000	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	19,463+147%	7,869
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	6144+586%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.17 TFLOPS+542%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1560 MHz	1665 MHz+7%
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	192+243%	56
L1 Cache	6 MB+582%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX A4000	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX A4000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 250% advantage for the RTX A4000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX A4000	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+250%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	RTX A4000	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	RTX A4000	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A4000 draws 140W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 60.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX A4000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	RTX A4000	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	140W	75W-46%
Recommended PSU	650W	300W-54%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	241mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	139.0+33%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The RTX A4000 launched at $1111 MSRP and currently averages $1111, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 93.2% less ($1036 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.5 (RTX A4000) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 499.4% better value. The RTX A4000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).