RTX A4000 vs Radeon RX 6700
RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 60% more VRAM (16 GB vs 10 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6700.
| Insight | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $1,111 for the RTX A4000, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 260% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+260%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,111) | ✅More affordable ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000 and Radeon RX 6700
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Radeon RX 6700
The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000 scores 19,463 and the Radeon RX 6700 reaches 18,920 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2450 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,463+3% | 18,920 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+167% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+70% | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2450 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+33% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+33% | 36 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 has 10 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) — a 40% advantage for the RTX A4000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+60% | 10 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+40% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700).
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000 draws 140W versus the Radeon RX 6700's 175W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX A4000) vs 550W (Radeon RX 6700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-20% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 139.0+29% | 108.1 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000 launched at $1111 MSRP and currently averages $1111, while the Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379 and now averages $300. The Radeon RX 6700 costs 73% less ($811 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.5 (RTX A4000) vs 63.1 (Radeon RX 6700) — the Radeon RX 6700 offers 260.6% better value.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1111 | $379-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1111 | $300-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.5 | 63.1+261% |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #85 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000 and Radeon RX 6700
