RTX A4000 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT
RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6700 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $230 versus $1,111 for the RTX A4000, it costs 79% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 390.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+390.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,111) | ✅More affordable ($230) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000 and Radeon RX 6700 XT
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Radeon RX 6700 XT
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000 scores 19,463 and the Radeon RX 6700 XT reaches 19,754 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6700 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,463 | 19,754+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+140% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+45% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2581 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+20% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT has 12 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — a 16.7% advantage for the RTX A4000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+17% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT).
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000 draws 140W versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 230W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX A4000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-39% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 139.0+62% | 85.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000 launched at $1111 MSRP and currently averages $1111, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479 and now averages $230. The Radeon RX 6700 XT costs 79.3% less ($881 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.5 (RTX A4000) vs 85.9 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the Radeon RX 6700 XT offers 390.9% better value.
| Feature | RTX A4000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1111 | $479-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1111 | $230-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.5 | 85.9+391% |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | March 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #85 | #80 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000 and Radeon RX 6700 XT
