RTX A4500 Embedded GPU vs Radeon PRO W6400
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W6400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is positioned at rank 76 and the Radeon PRO W6400 is on rank 33, so the Radeon PRO W6400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6400.
| Insight | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4500 Embedded GPU and Radeon PRO W6400
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.
Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU scores 8,485 and the Radeon PRO W6400 reaches 8,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 1215 MHz vs 2331 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6400) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,485 | 8,428 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+667% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.31 TFLOPS+300% | 3.58 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1215 MHz | 2331 MHz+92% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+283% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+2220% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+283% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).
| Feature | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU | Radeon PRO W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 50W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 106.1 | 168.6+59% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4500 Embedded GPU and Radeon PRO W6400
