
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (32 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $850 versus $2,015 for the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, it costs 58% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 118% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+118%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,015) | ✅More affordable ($850) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,431 points.

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2452 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,587 points. Launch price was $749.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 35,431 versus the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's 32,587 — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell leads by 8.7%. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 10,496 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 8,960 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Raw compute: 50.53 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 43.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2452 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 70 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) with 328 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35,431+9% | 32,587 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+17% | 8960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 50.53 TFLOPS+15% | 43.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2452 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 328+17% | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+17% | 8.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+33% | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+17% | 70 |
| Tensor Cores | 328+17% | 280 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 896 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+14% | 896 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+33% | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti).
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's 300W — a 40% difference. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 88 C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-33% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-9% | 88 C |
| Perf/Watt | 177.2+63% | 108.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell launched at $2399 MSRP and currently averages $2015, while the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti launched at $749 and now averages $850. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti costs 57.8% less ($1165 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.6 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 38.3 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers 117.6% better value.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399 | $749-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2015 | $850-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6 | 38.3+118% |
| Codename | GB203 | GB203 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | February 20 2025 |
| Ranking | #6 | #9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















