RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs GeForce RTX 5090
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 5090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+9.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,015 versus $2,700 for the GeForce RTX 5090, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 22.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($2,015) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,700) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell and GeForce RTX 5090
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,431 points.
GeForce RTX 5090
The GeForce RTX 5090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,867 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 35,431 versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 38,867 — the GeForce RTX 5090 leads by 9.7%. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 5090 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 10,496 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090). Raw compute: 50.53 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 170 (GeForce RTX 5090) with 328 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35,431 | 38,867+10% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496 | 21760+107% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 50.53 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+107% |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 328 | 680+107% |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB | 21.3 MB+107% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 96 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82 | 170+107% |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | 680+107% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 32 GB of GDDR7. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090) — the GeForce RTX 5090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 512-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 96 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5090). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5090). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5090).
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 575W — a 96.8% difference. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-65% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-35% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 177.2+162% | 67.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell launched at $2399 MSRP and currently averages $2015, while the GeForce RTX 5090 launched at $1999 and now averages $2700. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell costs 25.4% less ($685 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.6 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 14.4 (GeForce RTX 5090) — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers 22.2% better value.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399 | $1999-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2015-25% | $2700 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6+22% | 14.4 |
| Codename | GB203 | GB202 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #6 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell and GeForce RTX 5090
