RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs GeForce RTX 4080
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4080
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $4,799 for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 567.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+567.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,799) | ✅More affordable ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and GeForce RTX 4080
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 30,968 versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 34,445 — the GeForce RTX 4080 leads by 11.2%. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4080 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080). Raw compute: 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080). Boost clocks: 2377 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 110 RT cores (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4080) with 440 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,968 | 34,445+11% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 14080+45% | 9728 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 66.94 TFLOPS+37% | 48.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2377 MHz | 2505 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 176+57% | 112 |
| TMUs | 440+45% | 304 |
| L1 Cache | 13.8 MB+45% | 9.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 110+45% | 76 |
| Tensor Cores | 440+45% | 304 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4080 has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) — a 39.1% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+39% | 736 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080).
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 320W — a 6.5% difference. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4080). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W-6% | 320W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 310mm |
| Height | 111mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 103.2 | 107.6+4% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999 MSRP and currently averages $4799, while the GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199 and now averages $800. The GeForce RTX 4080 costs 83.3% less ($3999 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 43.1 (GeForce RTX 4080) — the GeForce RTX 4080 offers 563.1% better value. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6999 | $1199-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4799 | $800-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 43.1+563% |
| Codename | GB202 | AD103 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #13 | #7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and GeForce RTX 4080
