
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (287mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $930 versus $4,799 for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, it costs 81% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 421.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+421.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,799) | ✅More affordable ($930) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and Radeon RX 7900 XTX

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 30,968 and the Radeon RX 7900 XTX reaches 31,285 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 2377 MHz vs 2498 MHz. Ray tracing: 110 RT cores (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 96 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) with 440 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,968 | 31,285+1% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 14080+129% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 66.94 TFLOPS+9% | 61.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2377 MHz | 2498 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 176 | 192+9% |
| TMUs | 440+15% | 384 |
| L1 Cache | 13.8 MB+360% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+1500% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 110+15% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 960 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — a 6.7% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+100% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+7% | 960 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+1500% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 16.8% difference. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 287mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 68°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W-15% | 355W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-19% | 800W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 287mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 68°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 103.2+17% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999 MSRP and currently averages $4799, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999 and now averages $930. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX costs 80.6% less ($3869 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 33.6 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers 416.9% better value. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6999 | $999-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4799 | $930-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 33.6+417% |
| Codename | GB202 | Navi 31 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #13 | #12 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















