RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-14.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+14.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,015 versus $4,799 for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, it costs 58% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 172.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+172.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,799) | ✅More affordable ($2,015) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,431 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 30,968 versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 35,431 — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell leads by 14.4%. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 10,496 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Raw compute: 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 50.53 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2377 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 110 RT cores (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 82 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) with 440 Tensor cores vs 328.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,968 | 35,431+14% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 14080+34% | 10496 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 66.94 TFLOPS+32% | 50.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2377 MHz | 2407 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 176+57% | 112 |
| TMUs | 440+34% | 328 |
| L1 Cache | 13.8 MB+34% | 10.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 110+34% | 82 |
| Tensor Cores | 440+34% | 328 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 32 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 64 MB (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+50% | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 1024 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell).
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell draws 300W versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 200W — a 40% difference. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 200W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 103.2 | 177.2+72% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999 MSRP and currently averages $4799, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell launched at $2399 and now averages $2015. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell costs 58% less ($2784 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 17.6 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers 170.8% better value.
| Feature | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6999 | $2399-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4799 | $2015-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 17.6+171% |
| Codename | GB202 | GB203 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #13 | #6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
