RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q vs GeForce GTX 1650
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is positioned at rank #393 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 186.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q.
| Insight | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-186.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+186.5%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $8,565 for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q, it costs 99% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 32613.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32613.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,565) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q and GeForce GTX 1650
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q scores 2,747 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 186.5%. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2617 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,747 | 7,869+186% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 24064+2586% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 126 TFLOPS+4123% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2617 MHz+57% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+500% | 32 |
| TMUs | 752+1243% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 23.5 MB+2570% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB+12700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1792 GB/s (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 1300% advantage for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. Bus width: 512-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1792 GB/s+1300% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB+12700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 6th Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th Gen | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th Gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q draws 600W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 155.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 304mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 600W | 75W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 304mm | 229mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6 | 104.9+2180% |
Value Analysis
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565 MSRP and currently averages $8565, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 99.1% less ($8490 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 34866.7% better value. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8565 | $149-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8565 | $75-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 104.9+34867% |
| Codename | GB202 | TU117 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #609 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q and GeForce GTX 1650
