
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q vs GeForce GTX 560

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is positioned at rank #393 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is significantly newer (2025 vs 2011). The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $8,565 for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q, it costs 100% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 28668.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+28668.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,565) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q and GeForce GTX 560

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.

GeForce GTX 560
The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q scores 2,747 and the GeForce GTX 560 reaches 2,768 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,747 | 2,768 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 24064+7062% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 126 TFLOPS+11470% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 192+500% | 32 |
| TMUs | 752+1243% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 23.5 MB+5241% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB+25500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1792 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB+25500% | 0.5 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 560).
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th Gen | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th Gen | — |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q draws 600W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 600W | 150W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6 | 18.5+302% |
Value Analysis
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565 MSRP and currently averages $8565, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 99.6% less ($8535 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 30666.7% better value. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2011).
| Feature | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8565 | $199-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8565 | $30-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 92.3+30667% |
| Codename | GB202 | GF114 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | May 17 2011 |
| Ranking | #609 | #605 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















