RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q vs GeForce MX350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is positioned at rank 393 and the GeForce MX350 is on rank 348, so the GeForce MX350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

#378

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

46166%

#393

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

100%

#394

FireStream 9170

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20

100%

#395

Quadro FX 1700

MSRP: $699|Avg: $500

97%

#396

GRID P40-6Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

94%

#397

Quadro FX 540

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

84%

#398

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

75%

#399

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

75%

#400

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

75%

#401

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

72%

#402

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

72%

#403

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

69%

#405

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

63%

#406

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

63%

#407

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

56%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350

#338

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

960%

#340

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

870%

#341

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

868%

#345

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

789%

#346

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

784%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

100%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#350

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

98%

#351

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

98%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

96%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

94%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

94%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

94%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

93%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q.

Insight	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q	GeForce MX350
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity	Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm)	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (304mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce MX350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $8,565 for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q, it costs 98% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 4308.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q	GeForce MX350
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+4308.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,565)	✅More affordable ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Benchmark Check

GeForce MX350 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q and GeForce MX350

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q scores 2,747 and the GeForce MX350 reaches 2,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce MX350 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 640 (GeForce MX350). Raw compute: 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350). Boost clocks: 2617 MHz vs 937 MHz.

Feature	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q	GeForce MX350
G3D Mark Score	2,747	2,828+3%
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	24064+3660%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	126 TFLOPS+10409%	1.199 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2617 MHz+179%	937 MHz
ROPs	192+1100%	16
TMUs	752+2250%	32
L1 Cache	23.5 MB+10117%	0.23 MB
L2 Cache	128 MB+25500%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q	GeForce MX350
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 1792 GB/s (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 56 GB/s (GeForce MX350) — a 3100% advantage for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. Bus width: 512-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX350) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q	GeForce MX350
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR7	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	1792 GB/s+3100%	56 GB/s
Bus Width	512-bit+700%	64-bit
L2 Cache	128 MB+25500%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q draws 600W versus the GeForce MX350's 20W — a 187.1% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 350W (GeForce MX350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q	GeForce MX350
TDP	600W	20W-97%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	4.6	141.4+2974%

💰

Value Analysis

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565 MSRP and currently averages $8565, while the GeForce MX350 launched at $250 and now averages $200. The GeForce MX350 costs 97.7% less ($8365 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) vs 14.1 (GeForce MX350) — the GeForce MX350 offers 4600% better value. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).