RTX PRO 6000 vs L40
RTX PRO 6000
Popular choices:
L40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 6000
Performance Per Dollar L40
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 31.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the L40.
| Insight | RTX PRO 6000 | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+31.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-31.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX PRO 6000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $8,565 (vs $8,174), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 25.6% better value per dollar than the L40.
| Insight | RTX PRO 6000 | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,565) | ✅More affordable ($8,174) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 6000 and L40
RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 6000 scores 42,899 versus the L40's 32,601 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 31.6%. The RTX PRO 6000 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the L40 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000) vs 18,176 (L40). Raw compute: 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000) vs 90.52 TFLOPS (L40). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2490 MHz. Ray tracing: 188 RT cores (RTX PRO 6000) vs 142 (L40) with 752 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 42,899+32% | 32,601 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 24064+32% | 18176 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 115.8 TFLOPS+28% | 90.52 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2490 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 176 | 192+9% |
| TMUs | 752+32% | 568 |
| L1 Cache | 23.5 MB+32% | 17.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB+33% | 96 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 188+32% | 142 |
| Tensor Cores | 752+32% | 568 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 48 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) vs 96 MB (L40) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 960 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB+33% | 96 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000) vs 12.2 (L40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L40). Decoder: NVDEC 6th Gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40).
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th Gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th Gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 6000 draws 600W versus the L40's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The L40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 6000) vs 750W (L40). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 600W | 300W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.5 | 108.7+52% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565 MSRP and currently averages $8565, while the L40 launched at $31000 and now averages $8174. The L40 costs 4.6% less ($391 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) vs 4.0 (L40) — the RTX PRO 6000 offers 25% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8565-72% | $31000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8565 | $8174-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0+25% | 4.0 |
| Codename | GB202 | AD102 |
| Release | 2025 | October 13 2022 |
| Ranking | #608 | #61 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 6000 and L40
