
RTX PRO 6000

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
RTX PRO 6000 vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX PRO 6000 vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX PRO 6000 vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,040 less on MSRP ($8,565 MSRP vs $11,605 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $11,605 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 48 GB vs 96 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (96 GB vs 48 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌35.5% HIGHER MSRP$11,605 MSRPvs$8,565 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($11,605 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX PRO 6000 vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,223 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 6000 scores 42,899 and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition reaches 42,223 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 6000 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Raw compute: 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2617 MHz. Ray tracing: 188 RT cores (RTX PRO 6000) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) with 752 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 42,899+2% | 42,223 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 24064 | 24064 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 115.8 TFLOPS | 126 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2617 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 176 | 192+9% |
| TMUs | 752 | 752 |
| L1 Cache | 23.5 MB | 23.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 188 | 188 |
| Tensor Cores | 752 | 752 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition carries 96 GB. RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) vs 1792 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) — a 86.7% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the RTX PRO 6000 and 512-bit on the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB | 96 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+87% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 512-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB | 128 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 6th Gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition).
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th Gen | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th Gen | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 6000 draws 600W versus the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition's 600W — a 0% difference. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX PRO 6000) vs 650W (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 600W | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.5+2% | 70.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RTX PRO 6000 came in at $8565, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition launched at $11605. On MSRP, RTX PRO 6000 was 26.2% cheaper ($3040 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) vs 3.6 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) — the RTX PRO 6000 offers 38.9% better value.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8565-26% | $11605 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0+39% | 3.6 |
| Codename | GB202 | GB202 |
| Release | 2025 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #608 | #2 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













