
GeForce RTX 4090

RTX PRO 6000
GeForce RTX 4090 vs RTX PRO 6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4090 vs RTX PRO 6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4090 vs RTX PRO 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4090
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,966 less on MSRP ($1,599 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 375.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 450W instead of 600W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (512 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅0.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅46.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 512).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌435.6% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$1,599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 600W vs 450W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4090 vs RTX PRO 6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4090
The GeForce RTX 4090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,112 points. Launch price was $1,599.

RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4090 scores 38,112 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 12.6%. The GeForce RTX 4090 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 16,384 (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 128 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 512 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38,112 | 42,899+13% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 16384 | 24064+47% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+5% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 512 | 752+47% |
| L1 Cache | 16 MB | 23.5 MB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 128 MB+78% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 128 | 188+47% |
| Tensor Cores | 512 | 752+47% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4090 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX PRO 6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX PRO 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4090 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4090 has 24 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 carries 48 GB. RTX PRO 6000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce RTX 4090 and 384-bit on the RTX PRO 6000. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 48 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+5% | 960 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 128 MB+78% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4090) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 draws 450W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 304mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 450W-25% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 500W-50% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 304mm |
| Height | 137mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.7+18% | 71.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4090 came in at $1599, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4090 was 81.3% cheaper ($6966 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.8 (GeForce RTX 4090) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce RTX 4090 offers 376% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 6000 (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599-81% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.8+376% | 5.0 |
| Codename | AD102 | GB202 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #4 | #608 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














