RTXA5000-8Q vs RTXA5000-24Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTXA5000-8Q is positioned at rank 295 and the RTXA5000-24Q is on rank 331, so the RTXA5000-8Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-8Q

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

99%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

98%

#280

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7499%

#295

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

100%

#297

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

99%

#299

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

98%

#300

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

98%

#302

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

96%

#303

FirePro 3D V3700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

92%

#304

GRID T4-1Q

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600

89%

#305

GRID M60-2Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

88%

#306

NVS 310

MSRP: $159|Avg: $10

88%

#308

FirePro 3D V3750

MSRP: $199|Avg: $25

87%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

86%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-24Q

#117

L40

MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174

81%

#316

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

11452%

#331

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

100%

#333

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

99%

#334

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

98%

#335

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

98%

#336

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

98%

#337

Quadro FX 3450

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

97%

#338

GRID P40-24Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200

96%

#339

Quadro 4000

MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30

95%

#340

FireStream 9250

MSRP: $999|Avg: $49

91%

#341

GRID P40-3Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

89%

#342

GRID M10-2Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

84%

#343

Tesla K80

MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50

83%

#344

GRID M10-4Q

MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340

82%

#346

GRID M10-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

81%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTXA5000-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTXA5000-24Q.

Insight	RTXA5000-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RTXA5000-24Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,100 versus $2,500 for the RTXA5000-8Q, it costs 16% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 16.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RTXA5000-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+16.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,500)	✅More affordable ($2,100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTXA5000-8Q Benchmark Check

RTXA5000-24Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTXA5000-8Q and RTXA5000-24Q

RTXA5000-8Q

The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.

RTXA5000-24Q

The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RTXA5000-8Q scores 4,916 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTXA5000-8Q is built on Ampere while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 64 (RTXA5000-24Q) with 256 Tensor cores vs 256.

Feature	RTXA5000-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
G3D Mark Score	4,916+2%	4,803
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Process Node	8 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	8192	8192
Compute (TFLOPS)	27.77 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1695 MHz	1695 MHz
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	256	256
L1 Cache	8 MB	8 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	64	64
Tensor Cores	256	256

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTXA5000-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	RTXA5000-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTXA5000-8Q draws 230W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 0% difference. The RTXA5000-24Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RTXA5000-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
TDP	230W	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	21.4+2%	20.9

💰

Value Analysis

The RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2500, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721 and now averages $2100. The RTXA5000-24Q costs 16% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 2.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q offers 15% better value.