
RTXA5000-8Q

RTXA5000-24Q
RTXA5000-8Q vs RTXA5000-24Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTXA5000-8Q vs RTXA5000-24Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
RTXA5000-8Q vs RTXA5000-24Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,221 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
RTXA5000-24Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌48.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTXA5000-8Q vs RTXA5000-24Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.

RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTXA5000-8Q scores 4,916 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTXA5000-8Q is built on Ampere while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 64 (RTXA5000-24Q) with 256 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,916+2% | 4,803 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 8192 | 8192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.77 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 256 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 64 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | 256 | 256 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RTXA5000-8Q and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-24Q.
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RTXA5000-8Q draws 230W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 0% difference. The RTXA5000-24Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 21.4+2% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RTXA5000-8Q came in at $2500, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721. On MSRP, RTXA5000-8Q was 32.8% cheaper ($1221 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) vs 1.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q offers 53.8% better value.
| Feature | RTXA5000-8Q | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500-33% | $3721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0+54% | 1.3 |
| Codename | GA102 | GA102 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #53 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














