
Radeon RX 7600 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $748 for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 245.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+245.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($748) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 15.4%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 136.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+15% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4352+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+28% | 17.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+36% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 136+6% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4.3 MB+760% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 34+6% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 80.9% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 70W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 205.2+104% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849 and now averages $748. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 66.6% less ($498 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 19.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 245.3% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269-68% | $849 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-67% | $748 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+245% | 19.2 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GB206 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #118 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














