GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 87.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+87.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-87.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $550 versus $748 for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, it costs 26% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 154.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+154.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($550) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($748) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 87.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 184 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+87% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+35% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+71% | 17.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+26% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+35% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+35% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+13% | 32 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+35% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+35% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+13% | 32 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 167mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 167mm |
| Height | 137mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 205.2+52% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849 and now averages $748. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 26.5% less ($198 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 19.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 154.7% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-29% | $849 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550-26% | $748 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9+155% | 19.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | GB206 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #32 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
