
Ryzen 3 3300X

Xeon E-2176G
Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E-2176G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E-2176G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E-2176G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 3300X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $247 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $367 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 202.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 37.0 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $367 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2176G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,425 vs 13,593).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2176G, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon E-2176G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($367 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2176G better than Ryzen 3 3300X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E-2176G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 3300X
The Ryzen 3 3300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,425 points. Launch price was $120.

Xeon E-2176G
The Xeon E-2176G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,593 points. Launch price was $367.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 3300X packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2176G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E-2176G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3300X versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon E-2176G — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2176G (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3300X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E-2176G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3300X scores 13,425 against the Xeon E-2176G's 13,593 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E-2176G. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3300X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2176G.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3300X | Xeon E-2176G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,425 | 13,593+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 3300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2176G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3300X | Xeon E-2176G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 3 3300X was priced at $120, while the Xeon E-2176G came in at $367. On launch pricing ($120 vs $367), Ryzen 3 3300X was $247 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 3300X delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 37.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2176G — making the Ryzen 3 3300X the 100.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3300X | Xeon E-2176G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $120-67% | $367 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+202% | 37.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














