Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E5-2650 v4

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 3 3300X

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E5-2650 v4

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2016

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E5-2650 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 3300X

4 / 8

13,425

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2650 v4

12 / 24

13,290

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E5-2650 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E5-2650 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 3300X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,046 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
✅Delivers 881.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650 v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon E5-2650 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 3300X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,290 vs 13,425).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 3300X better than Xeon E5-2650 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2650 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 3300X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 3300X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 3300X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 3300X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 3300X comes in $1,046 cheaper on MSRP at $120 MSRP versus $1,166 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 881.5% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 11.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3300X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 3300X vs Xeon E5-2650 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 3300X

The Ryzen 3 3300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,425 points. Launch price was $120.

Xeon E5-2650 v4

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,290 points. Launch price was $1,166.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3300X packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3300X versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — a 38.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3300X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3300X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3300X scores 13,425 against the Xeon E5-2650 v4's 13,290 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 3 3300X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3300X vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3300X	Xeon E5-2650 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+48%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+73%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	13,425+1%	13,290

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 3 3300X versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — the Ryzen 3 3300X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 3 3300X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 3 3300X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v4) — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 3 3300X) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2650 v4).

Feature	Ryzen 3 3300X	Xeon E5-2650 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+33%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 3300X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 v4 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3300X	Xeon E5-2650 v4
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 3300X was priced at $120, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 came in at $1166. On launch pricing ($120 vs $1166), Ryzen 3 3300X was $1046 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 3300X delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — making the Ryzen 3 3300X the 163% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3300X	Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP	$120-90%	$1166
Performance per Dollar	111.9+882%	11.4
Release Date	2020	2016

Search Ryzen 3 3300X on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2650 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.