Ryzen 3 7320C vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

Ryzen 3 7320C vs Xeon E3-1240 v5 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 7320C

4 / 8

8,193

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1240 v5

4 / 8

8,258

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 7320C vs Xeon E3-1240 v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 7320C vs Xeon E3-1240 v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 7320C

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151, LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E3-1240 v5 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,193 vs 8,258).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1240 v5 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1240 v5

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151, LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320C moves to FT6 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 7320C better than Xeon E3-1240 v5?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240 v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 7320C is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1240 v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 7320C is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 7320C comes in at an unclear MSRP at $299 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1240 v5 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 7320C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015) and a healthier platform with FT6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 3 7320C vs Xeon E3-1240 v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 7320C

The Ryzen 3 7320C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,193 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1240 v5

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151, LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 8,258 points. Launch price was $282.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 3 7320C and Xeon E3-1240 v5 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320C versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v5 — a 5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7320C (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7320C uses the Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7320C scores 8,193 against the Xeon E3-1240 v5's 8,258 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1240 v5. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320C vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v5.

Feature	Ryzen 3 7320C	Xeon E3-1240 v5
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+5%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+46%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)	Skylake-DT (2015)
PassMark	8,193	8,258
Geekbench 6 Single	1,163	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 7320C uses the FT6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 v5 uses LGA1151, LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 7320C	Xeon E3-1240 v5
Socket	FT6	LGA1151, LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-5500	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 3 7320C) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240 v5). The Ryzen 3 7320C includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon E3-1240 v5 requires a dedicated GPU.