Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-2448L

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-2448L Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

4 / 4

6,661

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2448L

8 / 16

6,774

+1.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-2448L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-2448L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 70W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2448L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,661 vs 6,774).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2448L, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2448L mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2448L

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2448L better than Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2448L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2448L is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2448L is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2448L is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-2448L comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,661 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-2448L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,661 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2448L

The Xeon E5-2448L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,774 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2448L offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2448L has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G versus 2.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2448L — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2448L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G scores 6,661 against the Xeon E5-2448L's 6,774 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2448L. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2448L.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G	Xeon E5-2448L
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+67%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	20480 kB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	6,661	6,774+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2448L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.