Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-4620

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-4620 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

4 / 4

6,661

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-4620

8 / 16

6,635

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-4620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-4620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,847 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Delivers 631.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.7 vs 3.1 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4620 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-4620

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,635 vs 6,661).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 22.7 PassMark/$ ($2,141 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G better than Xeon E5-4620?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4620 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G comes in $1,847 cheaper on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $2,141 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4620 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 19.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 631.1% better value on MSRP (22.7 vs 3.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Xeon E5-4620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,661 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4620

The Xeon E5-4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,635 points. Launch price was $400.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-4620 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4620 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 — a 29.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G scores 6,661 against the Xeon E5-4620's 6,635 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs 16384 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G	Xeon E5-4620
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+35%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	16384 kB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,661	6,635

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G	Xeon E5-4620
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G was priced at $294, while the Xeon E5-4620 came in at $2141. On launch pricing ($294 vs $2141), Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G was $1847 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G delivers 22.7 pts/$ vs 3.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4620 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G the 151.9% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G	Xeon E5-4620
MSRP	$294-86%	$2141
Performance per Dollar	22.7+632%	3.1
Release Date	2018	2012

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.