Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
VS
Core i5-8265U

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Core i5-8265U

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i5-8265U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8265U

#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
100%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
99%
#341
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
505%
#342
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
497%
#343
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
457%
#344
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
455%
#345
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
450%
#347
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
435%
#348
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
417%
#349
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
416%
#350
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
405%
#353
Core i5-8265U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-8265U leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i5-8265U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i5-8265U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i5-8265U

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,831 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-8265U

The Core i5-8265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,812 points. Launch price was $297.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i5-8265U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8265U — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-8265U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-8265U uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U scores 5,831 against the Core i5-8265U's 5,812 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8265U.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i5-8265U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+31%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
12 nm-14%
14 nm
Architecture
Picasso (2019−2022)
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark
5,831
5,812
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,200
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8265U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i5-8265U
Socket
FP5
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8265U). The Core i5-8265U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 620), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8265U targets Mainstream Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i5-8265U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop