Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
VS
Core i7-3840QM

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Core i7-3840QM

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i7-3840QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3840QM

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
98%
#226
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
400%
#227
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
394%
#228
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
362%
#229
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
360%
#230
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
357%
#232
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
344%
#233
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
330%
#234
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
330%
#235
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
321%
#238
Core i7-3840QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U (2019) utilizes 12 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i7-3840QM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Picasso (2019−2022) / 12 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3840QM (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i7-3840QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Core i7-3840QM

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,831 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-3840QM

The Core i7-3840QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,871 points. Launch price was $568.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3840QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3840QM — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-3840QM (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i7-3840QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U scores 5,831 against the Core i7-3840QM's 5,871 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-3840QM. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-3840QM.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i7-3840QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
12 nm-45%
22 nm
Architecture
Picasso (2019−2022)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
5,831
5,871
Geekbench 6 Single
676
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3840QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i7-3840QM
Socket
FP5
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3840QM). The Core i7-3840QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3840QM targets Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-3840QM rivals A10-5750M.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3300UCore i7-3840QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mobile Workstation