Ryzen 5 220
VS
Core 5 210H

Ryzen 5 220 vs Core 5 210H

AMD

Ryzen 5 220

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core 5 210H

8 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 220

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
114%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
107%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
96%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 5 210H

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
102%
#149
Core 5 210H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
96%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
94%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 5 220 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 5 210H in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen 5 220Core 5 210H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 5 220Core 5 210H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 220 and Core 5 210H

AMD

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core 5 210H

The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core 5 210H offers 8 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 210H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 220 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core 5 210H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 220 scores 18,762 against the Core 5 210H's 18,602 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 220. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 210H.

FeatureRyzen 5 220Core 5 210H
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 12+33%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+2%
4.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+45%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+33%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
4 nm-60%
10 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
PassMark
18,762
18,602
Geekbench 6 Single
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 220 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 5 210H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 220Core 5 210H
Socket
FP8
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220) / not specified (Core 5 210H). The Ryzen 5 220 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core 5 210H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 5 220Core 5 210H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin and Light Laptop