Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon Gold 6244

Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon Gold 6244 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 220

6 / 12

18,762

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6244

8 / 16

18,609

0.0%

Core i7-9750HF

Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon Gold 6244 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon Gold 6244: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 220

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 150W, a 122W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Xeon Gold 6244 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6244 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6244, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6244 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6244

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 14.
✅242.9% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 14) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,609 vs 18,762).
❌435.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 220 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 220 better than Xeon Gold 6244?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6244 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 220 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 220 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 220 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 220 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6244 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (125.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon Gold 6244 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6244

The Xeon Gold 6244 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 18,609 points. Launch price was $2,925.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6244 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6244 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6244 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 220 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6244 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 220 scores 18,762 against the Xeon Gold 6244's 18,609 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 220. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6244.

Feature	Ryzen 5 220	Xeon Gold 6244
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+11%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24.75 MB+55%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	8 MB+700%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	18,762	18,609
Geekbench 6 Single	1,300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 220 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6244 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 220 versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6244 — the Ryzen 5 220 supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6244 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 220) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6244). PCIe lanes: 14 (Ryzen 5 220) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6244) — the Xeon Gold 6244 offers 34 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 5 220) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6244).

Feature	Ryzen 5 220	Xeon Gold 6244
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+91%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	1024 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	14	48+243%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6244). The Ryzen 5 220 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon Gold 6244 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6244 rivals EPYC 7262.