Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-2670

AMD

Ryzen 5 2400G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018
Ryzen family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2670

8 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-2670 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-2670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-2670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 2400G

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,383 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
  • Delivers 801.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 11, while Xeon E5-2670 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E5-2670.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2670 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (8,734 vs 8,901).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2670, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2670

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 12.
  • 233.3% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 51.7 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400G.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2670 better than Ryzen 5 2400G?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2670 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2400G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2670 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2670 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-2670 comes in 818.3% more expensive on MSRP at $1,552 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 2400G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 8,734 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 2400G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-2670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 5 2400G

The Ryzen 5 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $169.

Intel

Xeon E5-2670

The Xeon E5-2670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,901 points. Launch price was $145.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 2400G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2670 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400G versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2400G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2400G uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2400G scores 8,734 against the Xeon E5-2670's 8,901 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2670. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400G vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670.

FeatureRyzen 5 2400GXeon E5-2670
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+18%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+38%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
20480 kB (total)+400%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
8,734
8,901+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,800
Geekbench 6 Single
1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2400G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 5 2400G versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2670 — the Ryzen 5 2400G supports 83.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2670 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 2400G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2670). PCIe lanes: 12 (Ryzen 5 2400G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2670) — the Xeon E5-2670 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Ryzen 5 2400G) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2670).

FeatureRyzen 5 2400GXeon E5-2670
Socket
AM4
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933+83%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
384 GB+500%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
12
40+233%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 2400G has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 2400G) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2670). The Ryzen 5 2400G includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 11), while the Xeon E5-2670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2400G targets Entry Gaming Desktop, Xeon E5-2670 targets Server.

FeatureRyzen 5 2400GXeon E5-2670
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 11
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Entry Gaming Desktop
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 2400G was priced at $169, while the Xeon E5-2670 came in at $1552. On launch pricing ($169 vs $1552), Ryzen 5 2400G was $1383 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2400G delivers 51.7 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2670 — making the Ryzen 5 2400G the 160% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 2400GXeon E5-2670
MSRP
$169-89%
$1552
Performance per Dollar
51.7+807%
5.7
Release Date
2018
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.