Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 5 2400G

Intel

Core i7-7700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 2400G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 5 2400G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 5 2400G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 5 2400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7700

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • βœ…33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,435 vs 4,800).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.8 vs 51.7 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Ryzen 5 2400G

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…+234.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • βœ…Costs $103 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 62.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 2400G better than Core i7-7700?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7700 is ahead with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2400G pulls ahead with 234.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-7700 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2400G is the stronger fit. You are getting 234.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 2400G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 2400G comes in $103 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $272 MSRP, and it still gives you 234.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Core i7-7700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 62.7% better value on MSRP (51.7 vs 31.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 2400G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 5 2400G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-7700

The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.

AMD

Ryzen 5 2400G

The Ryzen 5 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $169.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7700 and Ryzen 5 2400G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400G β€” a 7.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-7700 uses the Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017βˆ’2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700 scores 8,642 against the Ryzen 5 2400G's 8,734 β€” a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 2400G. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,435 vs 4,800 (107.9% advantage for the Ryzen 5 2400G). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400G.

FeatureCore i7-7700Ryzen 5 2400G
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+8%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019)
Raven Ridge (2017βˆ’2019)
PassMark
8,642
8,734+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,435
4,800+234%
Geekbench 6 Single
β€”
1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi
β€”
3,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i7-7700 versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 5 2400G β€” the Ryzen 5 2400G supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-7700) vs 12 (Ryzen 5 2400G) β€” the Core i7-7700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 100-series,200-series (Core i7-7700) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Ryzen 5 2400G).

FeatureCore i7-7700Ryzen 5 2400G
Socket
LGA1151
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2933+22%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 2400G has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β€” a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-7700) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 2400G). Both include integrated graphics β€” HD Graphics 630 (Core i7-7700) and Radeon RX Vega 11 (Ryzen 5 2400G) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7700 targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 2400G targets Entry Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600.

FeatureCore i7-7700Ryzen 5 2400G
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Radeon RX Vega 11
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming
Entry Gaming Desktop
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-7700 was priced at $272, while the Ryzen 5 2400G came in at $169. On launch pricing ($272 vs $169), Ryzen 5 2400G was $103 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7700 delivers 31.8 pts/$ vs 51.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2400G β€” making the Ryzen 5 2400G the 47.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-7700Ryzen 5 2400G
MSRP
$272
$169-38%
Performance per Dollar
31.8
51.7+63%
Release Date
2017
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.